GOP Offers Reform Alternative, Hoyer Says It Protects Status Quo
House Republicans on Tuesday unveiled their alternative health reform plan to the current bill (HR 3962) making its way to the House floor by the end of the week. Not surprisingly, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) called the proposal an "effort to protect the status quo while attempting to disguise them as real healthcare reform."
While the full 230 page alternative is still being tweaked, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said Tuesday that its focus is on lowering healthcare costs—as opposed to expanding healthcare coverage. "We first released our healthcare plan in June and over the last six months, we have introduced at least eight bills which taken together would implement this blueprint," he said in his weekly Republican address.
Among the elements of the alternative plan are:
- Permitting families and businesses to buy health insurance across state lines.
- Allowing individuals, small businesses, and trade associations to pool together and acquire health insurance at lower prices as large corporations and labor unions currently do.
- Allowing states to implement their own reforms in addressing healthcare costs.
- End "junk lawsuits" that contribute to healthcare costs by increasing the number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order; these laws would be modeled after laws in California and Texas.
- Establishing a "universal access program" to guarantee access to care for those with pre existing conditions and reforming high risk pools and reinsurance programs.
- Promoting prevention and wellness by giving employers greater flexibility to financially reward employees who adopt healthier lifestyles.
- Creating new incentives to save for future and long term care needs by allowing qualified participants to use health savings accounts to pay premiums.
Janice Simmons is a senior editor and Washington, DC, correspondent for HealthLeaders Media Online. She can be reached at jsimmons@healthleadersmedia.com.
- Sebelius Lashes Out at Anthem for Premium Increases
- Nurse Anesthetists Say They Practice Safely Without Physician Supervision
- 10 Ways to Improve Handoffs in Your Hospital
- There are Big Bucks in Better Patient Flow
- Doctors Sue To Stop Unsupervised Nurse Anesthetists from Administering Anesthesia
- Can Nurses Drive Health Reform?
- CT Hospital was Prepared for Power Plant Explosion
- Expectant Moms, The White House is Calling
- Texas nurse to stand trial for reporting doctor
- HIPAA Harm Threshold Works, Say Providers


John W (11/4/2009 at 2:45 PM)
This puts the noise about 2,000 pages for the Democrats' bill into perspective, if it takes the GOP "alternative" 220 pages just to do essentially nothing. Health care reform opponents are fond of saying members of Congress should be required to give up their current federal employee health coverage and be forced to participate in the "public option," by which they presumably mean the exchanges (in which a public option would be only one choice on the menu). Good idea. Those members of Congress supporting this "alternative" should be forced to participate in it and see how they like having no protection regarding pre-existing conditions except for the vague promise of expanded state high risk pools(privatizing the profit and socializing the risk). Judging from watching on CSPAN, it's doubtful that many members would fare very well with private individual insurance market underwriting and rescission practices.